EPA Proposes Phaseout of Fluoride-Based PesticideBy ELANA SCHOR of Greenwire
U.S. EPA today proposed to start gradually banning a pesticide often used on cocoa beans and dried fruits that degrades to fluoride, a move closely linked to the Obama administration’s decision last week to curb the maximum levels of fluoride in drinking water out of concern for children’s health.

EPA’s bid to wind down legal use of sulfuryl fluoride, citing the health risk to children posed by aggregate fluoride exposure, marks a long-awaited victory by the three public-health groups that first asked the agency to rein in the pesticide more than five years ago.

One of the three advocacy organizations, the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said the sulfuryl fluoride phaseout appears to be EPA’s first official granting of any pesticide restriction petition filed by green advocates.

The Department of Health and Human Services and EPA announced Friday that fluoride, long considered a beneficial tap-water additive that helps prevent cavities, should be restricted to 0.7 milligrams per liter, or the low end of previous legal ranges (E&ENews PM, Jan. 7).

In its proposed prohibition on sulfuryl fluoride, EPA acknowledged that the pesticide’s residues on food are “responsible for a tiny fraction of aggregate fluoride exposure” but deemed that children’s total contact with fluoride in the environment — through drinking water as well as toothpaste — posed an excess risk of tooth and bone damage.

This week’s twin fluoride restrictions reflect “a growing consensus that Americans are exposed to too much fluoride,” EWG senior vice president for research, Jane Houlihan, said today. “It raises the concern that, for many decades now, the public has been overexposed.”

First approved for use as an anti-termite insecticide more than 50 years ago, sulfuryl fluoride was federally registered for use on food in 2004 and 2005 by Dow AgroSciences LLC as an alternative to methyl bromide, a pesticide that began to be phased out of commerce after the 1987 Montreal Protocol identified it as a depleter of the ozone layer.

Soon after the chemical was approved as a food fumigant, the advocacy groups Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and Beyond Pesticides joined EWG in filing a formal objection with EPA. As in the case of Friday’s fluoride announcement, today’s sulfuryl fluoride limits came in the wake of a revised risk assessment the agency conducted after a 2006 National Academy of Sciences report urged it to consider dental fluorosis as a negative health consequence of exposure rather than a cosmetic impediment.

Dental fluorosis, which manifests as spotting on the teeth among children who consume too much fluoride as their mouths develop, can lead to long-term breakdown of the tooth enamel and other painful effects.

The gradual EPA removal of sulfuryl fluoride allowances will be subject to public comment before taking effect and include a three-year head start for significantly affected industries such as the cocoa and walnuts sectors.

Estimating that the pesticide is applied to 100 percent of cocoa crops, EPA warned in its proposed phaseout that “cocoa imports (which in 2009 were valued at approximately $1.2 billion) would be lost due to either destruction or refusal of shipments by warehouse operators” unless businesses can develop a viable alternative to sulfuryl fluoride for cocoa fumigation.

Today’s EPA proposal also references multiple objections Dow had raised in previous years to arguments made by the advocacy groups behind the petition, suggesting that pushback from industry on the sulfuryl fluoride limits can be reasonably expected.

Click here (pdf) to read a pre-publication copy of EPA’s proposal to phase out sulfuryl fluoride tolerances.

Copyright 2011 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Someone told me once, bring a gift for everyone, every time you see them. I think this is a great piece of advice.

If you are thinking that this is impossible, realise that giving doesn’t have to involve physical objects. In fact, in my experience, it is better for it not to be. Give a smile or a kind thought, hug a crying friend, open a door for a stranger, work to forgive those who hurt you, say a silent prayer when you drive past an accident. That way, we never run out, and we never get tired.

Why? This is a step towards one of the most transformative spiritual practices of all – the simple decision to be kind, easy-going, and forgiving to everyone, including oneself.

If you believe in the idea that we are all one consciousness, that the idea of “me” is just an illusion of separation, then this is a practice that dissolves that boundary between self and not-self. When we give, no longer are we thinking of ourselves. No longer are we the tiny ego, the small self, the selfish person. If we are genuinely kind, we become – for that brief moment – connected to something far bigger, far more majestic.

Other teachings say that whatever you give comes back to you, since we are all interconnected. If we all swim in the same ocean, then whatever we spread outwards also affects us. Would you put kindness or hatred into the ocean that you yourself swim in?

This can have psychological benefits too – caring for a beloved pet is a proven effective way to reduce depression. Giving kindness, whoever the recipient is, makes you feel better.

If you don’t believe in any of this, then you will have lived a kind and generous life for its own sake.

We cannot give with expectation of a reward. Not even a “thank you”. It is very easy to fall into the trap of giving for the sake of receiving. And this “temptation” returns again and again. When I first made the decision to be kind to everyone, I did it without any expectations of return, which is how it should be. But over the months that followed, I noticed how everyone reacted to me – people treated me kindly, went out of their way for me, gave me lots of approval. This was something I craved, so this temptation had come back in – I wanted their affection and approval, and that had contaminated my kindness. It was kindness at first, but became corrupted further down the road.

In fact, there were deeper levels to this false giving. This kindness came from a secret feeling of worthlessness. That I will not be liked for who I am, so at least I will be liked for my giving. This was unknown and hidden from me at first, and can be quite hard to see, so look especially hard for similar motivations in yourself.

Even worse, false giving won’t heal any deeper insecurities you might have. In my case, it didn’t heal my hidden sense of worthlessness at all – because the appreciation and kindness I got back never reached it. If I give from a mask, then the appreciation I get only reaches that mask, and not my heart.

This just leads to more frustration, and a deepening insecurity. Sometimes we even hate ourselves for our false giving, because on some level, we know it isn’t genuine.

This simple decision can be hard at times; it is something that I am still practicing. But the more I practice, the more I see the truth in the old saying – happiness comes not from being loved, but from loving. Loving is its own reward.

Five years ago, her daughter, then 3, was invited to play at the home of a new friend. At snack time, having noted the presence of sugar (in the form of juice boxes and cookies) in the kitchen, Dr. Kawash, then a Rutgers professor, brought out a few jelly beans.

The mother froze. Her child had never tasted candy, she explained, but perhaps it would be all right just this once. Then the father weighed in from the other room, shouting that they might as well give the child crack cocaine.

“It was clear to me that there was an irrational equation of candy and danger in that house,” Dr. Kawash said in a recent interview. “And that was irresistible to me.”

From that train of thought, the Candy Professor blog was born. In her writing there, Dr. Kawash dives deep into the American relationship with candy, finding irrational and interesting ideas everywhere. The big idea behind Candy Professor is that candy carries so much moral and ethical baggage that people view it as fundamentally different — in a bad way — from other kinds of food.

“At least candy is honest about what it is,” she said. “It has always been a processed food, eaten for pleasure, with no particular nutritional benefit.” Today, she said, every aisle in the supermarket contains highly manipulated products that have those qualities.

And, she points out, many people who avoid candy will cheerfully eat sugar-packed chocolate-chip energy bars and drink Gatorade for health reasons, although a serving of Gatorade contains about the same amount of sugar as a dozen pieces of candy corn. Dr. Kawash’s expertise is in American culture and gender studies, but some nutritionists share her views on the pariah status of candy.

“I don’t think candy is bad for you,” said Rachel Johnson, a nutrition professor at the University of Vermont who was the lead author of the American Heart Association’s comprehensive 2009 review of the scientific literature on sugar and cardiovascular health.

Dr. Johnson said that candy is considered bad because it lacks the “health halo” that hovers over sweet food like granola bars and fruit juice. “Nutritionally there is little difference between a gummy bear and a bite of fruit leather,” she said.

Dr. Johnson also noted that candy provides only 6 percent of the added sugar in the American diet, while sweet drinks and juice supply 46 percent. “There’s reason to believe that sugar in liquid form is actually worse than candy, because it fills you up and displaces healthier food choices,” she said.

Dr. Kawash, who studied architectural theory, narratives of women and medicine, and the imagery of terrorism before she began to write Candy Professor, has complicated feelings about her current specialty. She describes her childhood in Sunnyvale, Calif., in the 1970s as an “endless, and mostly frustrating quest for candy,” restricted to a small weekly indulgence after church on Sundays. Later, she said, binges on gummy bears and spice drops fueled her undergraduate research at Stanford; more recently, she found herself flushing handfuls of candy corn down the toilet to prevent herself from eating “just a few more.”

Fortunately, some of that passion has now been channeled into research. There are many blogs devoted to tasting, photographing and tracking down obscure types of candy, such as Candy Addict and Candy Blog, but Dr. Kawash’s work is rarely about taste or nostalgia. She is much more interested in untangling the threads of control, danger and temptation that candy has carried since it became widely available in the 1880s.

Until then, most candies — like fudge, brittle and taffy — were homemade, and store-bought hard candies like horehound sticks and peppermints were relatively expensive. But advances in technology enabled sugar to be spun, aerated, softened and flavored in new ways, and sold cheaply. Just like that, candy entered popular culture.

Dr. Kawash notes that candy, like cigarettes, was long advertised as having health benefits. “Eat Tootsie Rolls — The Luscious Candy That Helps Beat Fatigue,” reads one of the many ads she has exhaustively analyzed on her blog. One post is dedicated to the “slippage” between candy and medicine that she has found in a close reading of the history of cough drops — hard candy in a socially acceptable form.

But there have always been what she calls “candy alarmists,” who warned that candy was too stimulating, too soporific, poisoned, or otherwise hazardous. Dangerous candy appears in many fairy tales, a theme continued with the modern public-safety message, “Don’t take candy from strangers,” and in public scares over tampering and contamination. (Dr. Kawash recently detailed how all of this led to the candy wrappers we know today in The Journal of American Culture.)

In the early 20th century, she said — in the absence of any medical evidence — doctors blamed candy for the spread of polio. In the 1970s, refined sugar approached the top of the food counterculture’s list of enemies, spurred by international best sellers like “Sugar Blues” and “Sweet and Dangerous.” Tooth decay was the longtime threat; more recently, the global spread of obesity has prompted fears of the “empty calories” in candy.

Now a tentative cook and a buyer of organic eggs, Dr. Kawash is convinced that candy is often the scapegoat when Americans sense that something is wrong in the food supply. The social critic in her says that corn syrup and the cheap candy produced with it have unhinged our notions of how much candy is too much. At the same time, the historian in her can’t help pointing out that “corn syrup was a wonderful thing for candy.” Its invention in the late 19th century made the commercial production of soft confections like fudge and candy corn possible.

The disruption of traditional agricultural systems — including the presence of corn in so many processed foods — has also dislodged candy from its established place as an occasional treat.

“Candy should not be sold in huge bags at the drugstore,” said Jennifer King, a founder of Liddabit Sweets, a small candy company in Brooklyn that proudly sells candy bars — such as a recreated Snickers — for as much as $6.50. Liddabit products are indulgent but also virtuous: Ms. King and her partner, Liz Gutman, make treats like apple-maple lollipops and spiced caramel chews by hand, from prestigious and often local ingredients. (The honey in the honeycomb candy is gathered from hives in New York City.)

Dr. Kawash says that the fetishization of candy ingredients and the aestheticization of candy — like the color-coordinated candy landscapes now popular at weddings — are relatively new.

“When the moneyed classes indulge in sugar, it’s part of an acceptable leisure activity,” she said, chewing over the significance of high-end candy destinations like Dylan’s Candy Bar.

“But when poor people do the same thing, it’s considered pathological,” she added, citing the current debate over using food stamps to buy soda, candy and other “bad” foods.

Dr. Kawash, 46, retired from teaching in 2009. She said that her increasing interest in candy was making it difficult to fulfill her administrative, teaching and parental responsibilities, and knew that studying the evolution of the shape of the Hershey’s Kiss would never win her respect within the academy.

The blog is not so much a public forum, she said, as a “research trail,” a way of chronicling the hours she now spends reading old issues of Confectioners’ Journal, scanning patent applications, and combing archived phone books to count the number of candy shops in Brooklyn in 1908 (564).

Dr. Kawash says her research is partly fueled by anger toward candy manufacturers who publish inaccurate, often sugarcoated histories of their products. In fact, she says, the home-kitchen inventions of candy-shop owners were often simply copied, stolen or swallowed up by large companies.

“The history of candy, like the history of wars, is always written by the winners,” she said. “We can’t just let that go unchallenged.”

Dental Malady Delays Lil Wayne Sentencing

It was the kind of tense courtroom scene that John Grisham would have wrestled Scott Turow to the ground for: a high-profile defendant. A long-anticipated sentencing. A judge ready to bang the gavel. And then: a three-week postponement for dental surgery.

On Tuesday, a Manhattan judge gave the rapper Lil Wayne permission to put off his sentencing on a weapons possession charge so that he could undergo dental work in Miami, The Associated Press reported.

Lil Wayne, the multiplatinum-selling performer whose real name is Dwayne Carter, appeared in State Supreme Court, where he was due to be sentenced on charges stemming from a July 2007 incident in which a loaded .40-caliber semiautomatic gun was found on his tour bus. He pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in October.

But a lawyer for Lil Wayne said on Tuesday that Lil Wayne needed to be treated for a “medical situation” that could not be attended to sooner, because his dentist had been out of the country performing charity work. Judge Charles Solomon granted an adjournment and rescheduled the sentencing for March 2.

Lil Wayne could face a sentence of one year on his gun charge, and is scheduled to go on trial March 30 on felony drug possession and weapons charges, following a January 2008 incident in Arizona.

A Different Perspective on Stress Relief and Management

Stress seems to be an inescapable part of life, doesn’t it? I remember one of my lectures on stress – I always thought stress just came from a high workload, but woah, I was wrong. It all differs depending on the person – stress can be financial, social, mental, or emotional. It can come from pressure and conflict. It can come from natural disasters, noise, and pollution. It can come from low self-esteem, an impatient and perfectionist personality, all sorts of stuff.

What is it for you? If stress is a problem for you, think of something that really gets you, and then read on with it in mind – perhaps there are different ways of handling your stress, not the usual massage or walk in nature. Perhaps we can prevent stress from arising in the first place.

Relaxed at work? Really?
A Quick Overview
There is an increasing awareness of stress in society, from its harmful effects to its sources and ways to manage it. Here’s a quick, and very simplified, overview.

■A stressor happens – for example, a dog jumps up and starts chasing you angrily.
■The body responds. It’s a survival mechanism; your heart rate and blood pressure increases, more blood flows to the muscles. This allows the classic “fight or flight” response.
■This is great for the short term, we have more resources available to handle whatever happened. The problem arises, however, when the stressor occurs over a long period of time.
■The body needs to return to balance and recuperate after such events. If it doesn’t get a chance to, the body will then wear itself out very quickly.
■For example, if your stressor isn’t a dog, but a job that requires 12 hours a day, dealing with loud and angry customers.
■Your body remains in this “alarm” stage the whole time, and very often we can’t “switch off” even when we get home.
■The increased blood pressure and heart rate then becomes damaging, over long periods of time, it can damage blood vessels, increase risk of cardiovascular disease, and a whole lot of other stuff.
Things are made worse, as our stress system was made for physical stressors, and not so much the social, mental, or emotional stressors that we increasingly deal with nowadays.

I’ve found the standard strategies to be very helpful in this regard. Get some regular exercise, book in a relaxing massage, take a walk in nature, or learn some time management skills – even assertiveness skills, such as learning to say “no” to an extra demand on your time.

A Different Perspective
But one thing you’ll notice about these strategies: they reduce stress after it has already occurred. Is it possible for stress not to arise in the first place? In my experience, yes, but these are just my experiences and thoughts – please ignore me if you disagree with them.

We seem to think that stress comes from the outside world, right? It comes from the workload in the office, the screaming and shouting at home, and the howling dog next door. But what if it comes from our internal resistance to these things?

Maybe an example might make it easier to see. One man’s music is another’s loud noise. One might love rock music and blast it at full volume, but this causes his brother to wince. But if it is the same song, why is there such a difference in reactions? Perhaps, the music itself is neutral. Our responses – whether we are stressed by it or we fall asleep listening to it – depend purely on us.

Do you agree with me so far? What if we applied the same idea to your stressor? In my last examination period in June, I was going nearly insane from stress and fell sick. I was studying and working from the moment I woke up to the moment I fell asleep, with little breaks for food. But what if the workload itself was neutral; what if my stress came from my inner resistance to it? Would doing some inner work around this area change this stress? In my experience, very much so!

By comparison, I just finished the recent October examination period, where the workload was even higher than the June period. But this time, the stress wasn’t there. Now, I’m not talking about some magical state. I still needed to go for walks to stretch out my legs, I still needed some coffee to keep me awake, and I was still physically tired (by analogy, even if I love rock music, playing it at maximum volume will still hurt my ears). But I was not emotionally stressed. I didn’t mind working and studying 14 hours a day, in fact I felt quite fulfilled by it. So it is possible for stressors to happen and still be at peace.

What Can We Do?
There are two ways I’ve found to handle this. For new readers, they tie back to my old favourites – the two Core Practices of emotional or cognitive work.

1.If you are the type of person who prefers working with emotions, please read Welcoming and Releasing Emotions.
2.If you prefer working with your thoughts or beliefs, you can try the psychological Cognitive Distortion techniques, or undo your thoughts with The Work.
The Resistance
The first way involves dealing with this resistance straight on, using the technique that works for you the best. As an example, I might look at my calendar and see that I still have THAT MUCH to do, and feel frustration, or despair. I’ll dive straight into those feelings and in doing so, let them go. Or, the thoughts around this workload might be – It’s not fair, I can’t take it anymore, I should be out at the beach, or how come I’m not Donald Trump’s son?

Spend a few minutes a day, maybe half an hour, letting go of these feelings, or undoing these thoughts, and see if things don’t change.

The Failure
The second way, and my favourite, was taught to me by Tom Stine. In essence, we explore what might happen in the other direction. What if I didn’t do all these things? What if I didn’t work hard? What if I didn’t have a job, what if I didn’t run if a mad dog was chasing me? (Of course, this is not to recommend that you do or don’t do those things – it’s purely an inner exploration.)

Explore it; go into it, all the fears and emotions and whatever it is that arises. For example, if someone was working every weekend in the hopes of getting a promotion, then what will happen if she didn’t get that promotion? And just follow it, and make it as bad as possible. There’s an explorative technique for getting to the roots of our fears, called the “And then what?” We can adapt this technique to whatever is underneath our stress, even if it wasn’t fear.

What if I didn’t get that promotion? Then I won’t have enough money. And then what? Then I’ll lose my house. And then what? Then I’ll have to move back home. And then what? Then I’ll be the laughing stock of all my friends. And so on, until we get to the root.

And we can work with these results in the same way. In my own work, I chose to delve into my emotions, as if all my worst-case scenarios had come true, and feeling the pains I would have if they did. Or we can work with the thoughts in the same way: Is it true that I will be the laughing stock if I have to move back home? (Some of the thoughts might not make sense or be easy to undo, though, which is why I chose the emotional techniques).

What Will Happen
In feeling and dropping the underlying emotions, by and by we find that they no longer drive our actions. It might not happen overnight, but slowly we begin to see that that it isn’t that bad, even if we fail. We might see that we will basically be OK if we can roll with the punches. If we don’t get this job, we’ll get another one. If our flight is delayed for hours, we’ll catch up on some reading.

What happens when we have this inner freedom? Our attention and our energy become dedicated to the action itself. No longer is it a stressor, something that has to be done with gritted teeth; now, it becomes a joy, a fulfilment of potential.

First, you will need to discuss your options with your dentist. Together, it will be decided if you are a good candidate for dental implants. The dentist will take a complete dental history, x-rays, and complete a thorough oral examination. If you are a candidate for implant surgery, the procedure is as follows:

1. Surgical placement of the implant(s) into the bone. This is usually done right in the dentist’s office, with a local anesthetic. After surgery, there is a healing period of approximately four months. During this time, the implants fuse to the bone by a process known as ‘osseointegration’.

2. Next, there is a minor surgical exposure of the top of the implant, whereby the dentist will attach the post to the implant. The function of the post is to become the support for either one tooth or a set of teeth. This is a short procedure that usually requires only local anesthesia.

3. The last phase is the restorative phase. The dentist will take impressions and then make a prosthesis that will attach to the implants. This will require several visits. Once completed, your mouth will be restored to natural looking, strong teeth.

What Exactly Does the Dental Implant Procedure Involve?
First, you will need to discuss your options with your dentist. Together, it will be decided if you are a good candidate for dental implants. The dentist will take a complete dental history, x-rays, and complete a thorough oral examination. If you are a candidate for implant surgery, the procedure is as follows:
1. Surgical placement of the implant(s) into the bone. This is usually done right in the dentist’s office, with a local anesthetic. After surgery, there is a healing period of approximately four months. During this time, the implants fuse to the bone by a process known as ‘osseointegration’.

2. Next, there is a minor surgical exposure of the top of the implant, whereby the dentist will attach the post to the implant. The function of the post is to become the support for either one tooth or a set of teeth. This is a short procedure that usually requires only local anesthesia.

3. The last phase is the restorative phase. The dentist will take impressions and then make a prosthesis that will attach to the implants. This will require several visits. Once completed, your mouth will be restored to natural looking, strong teeth.

Is the concept of dental implants a new one?
Interestingly, dental implants have been performed for thousands of years. Egyptian mummies have been found with gold wire implants in the jawbones. Pre-Columbian skeletal remains exhibit dental implants made of semi-precious stones. Recently, a Roman soldier was unearthed in Europe with an iron dental implant in his jawbone. In the Middle East, implants made of ivory have been discovered in skeletons from the Middle Ages.
Modern implantology began in the United States at the beginning of the 20th century. However, popularity really grew in the 1980’s with the increased success of the titanium cylinder. Since then, many brand name implants with minor variations have been approved.

What factors contribute to long-term success of Dental Implants?
Long-term success depends on multiple factors. First off, success will depend on the quality and quantity of bone. The better the bone and the more available, the greater the chance of long-term success. Secondly, the experience and ability of the dental surgeon will be a factor. As with any surgical procedure, there is no substitute for the experience and individual talent of the dentist. And finally, the quality of the restoration placed on top of the implant will play a big role in long-term success. If the design of the implant crowns or overdentures are poorly constructed, and biting forces are not balanced, even the best-placed dental implant will have a compromised survival rate.
Who can place a dental implant in my mouth?
A periodontist, an oral surgeon, or an implantologist places dental implants. The periodontist and oral surgeon are teamed with a restorative dentist. They will place the implants and then the patient will be seen by a restorative dentist for completion of the crowns or overlying appliance. There will be two dentists during the course of treatment. An implantologist is trained in both dental implant surgery and restoration of the dental prosthesis. An implantologist will do both the surgery and the restoration, and there will be only one dentist during the course of treatment.
Who can restore the teeth on the top of dental implants?
A general dentist trained to restore implants, an oral implantologist, or a prosthodontist can restore teeth. It is the choice of the patient to use a “one doctor approach,” whereby the oral implantologist does both the surgery and the restoration, or the “two doctor approach,” whereby the surgery and restoration are performed by two different clinicians.
Are there any age limitations for dental implants?
No. Any person at any age can have dental implants as long as there is enough bone available in which to place the implants.
What might be some of the factors that would prevent me from being an implant candidate?
There are some medical factors that might prevent a person from being a good candidate for dental implants. Some of these may be uncontrolled diabetes, chemotherapy or radiation therapy, parathyroid disorders, blood disorders, rare bone disorders or bone marrow cancer. Some physical factors may include insufficient or poor quality bone, low sinuses or nerve bundles.
How often will I need to have my dental implants checked?
The success of your implants will depend greatly on how well you maintain them. They will need to be professionally cleaned by a hygienist and examined by your implant dentist every three to four months. This hygienist should be trained in the specific procedure of maintaining dental implants. Also, brushing and flossing daily is absolutely necessary for long-term success.
Is dental implant surgery painful?
No. An effective local anesthetic is used during the surgery so that you do not have any discomfort during the placement of the implants. The mild discomfort you might experience after surgery can be controlled with medications.
When can I return to work after implant surgery?
You can go to work the next day, unless some particular surgical circumstance arises. Your implant dentist will discuss all postoperative instructions with you.

We know we should. We mean to. But many times, we put off visiting the dentist until there’s a problem - like intense pain.
This approach is a big mistake.
“Dentistry’s strength is in it’s model of prevention.” said Mary J. Hayes, DDS, spokeswoman for the American Dental Association. She likens oral care to car care: regular maintenance can prvent needless disasters.
“And we should care for our teeth at least as well as we do our cars.” She says.
1 YEAR OLD
Forget what you’ve heard: the ADA - along with the American Academy of Pediatries and other experts - now reccomends that a child see a dentist around his or her first birhtday. “A lot of decay starts in very young children and can be very hard to treat.” Hayes says.
CHILDHOOD
Between regular checkups, Hayes reccomends, children should visit a dentist if anything seems “off”. You probably wouldn’t know if your your child had a cavity: If you see anything, that means it’s pretty big.” It’s also a good idea to have a dentist check your childs mouth if he or she had a fall with a chin impact. Teeth can chip with out the parent or child realizing it.
TWEENS AND TEEN
One hazard: increased soda consumption. “Both regular and diet sodas harm teeth.” says Hayes, “because the phosphates they contain interfere with calcium deposition.”
ADULTS
Most adults should visit a dentist every six months to a year. Some people, however, accumlate a lot of calculus, or tartar, because thier body chemistry. If you find you’re one of them, consider having a cleaning three to four times a year. Still tempted to put off that checkup? “Dentists can screen for oral cancer, which can be devastating if not caught early.” Hayes says.
SENIORS
“Older people need to keep up with dental care and keep those natural teeth intact for as long as possible,” Hayes says. “As we age, we have enough problems without our nutrition being compromised because of trouble eating. And you wouldn’t want to add a dental problem on top of other health issues.”
-By Caolyn Sperry
GateHouse News Service

Teeth: Milk not necessary

If a tooth falls out, it’s important to keep the ligament trailing off the end of the tooth moist. But the old wives’ tale about putting the tooth in a glass of milk is wrong, says Dr. Kimberly Harms, a spokeswoman for the American Dental Association who practices in Farmington, Minnesota.

Rinsing the tooth with milk (or water) is a good idea, she says. Milk is useful not because of its calcium content, as many believe, but because it has a neutral pH, she says.

If you lose a tooth, say, at a ball game, and neither milk nor water is immediately available, “suck off the dirt,” she advises.

After rinsing, immediately put the tooth back in its socket. To make sure you’ve put it in correctly, bite down, and it should feel normal. “I’ve had patients put it in backward,” Harms says.

If for some reason, you can’t keep the tooth in its place, the second best option is to keep the tooth in between the gum and the cheek, she adds.

Then get to the dentist or the emergency room as quickly as possible. “The critical period is an hour,” she says. “The longer the tooth is out, the less chance of having a successful implantation.”

If your child loses a baby tooth, chances are the dentist won’t reattach it, but visit the dentist anyway to make sure the root of the tooth isn’t broken, Harms advises.

Here’s some advice about teeth that have suffered trauma from the National Library of Medicine. Parenting magazine has information about knocked-out baby teeth.